This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Saywitz, K. J. Articles by Lamphear, V. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Saywitz, K. J. Articles by Lamphear, V. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Helping Children Tell What Happened: A Follow-Up Study of the Narrative Elaboration Procedure

Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

Lynn Snyder

California State University, Long Beach

Vivian Lamphear

Private Practice

In cases of child maltreatment, children are required to recount past experiences in pretrial interviews, courtroom examination, and abuse-focused therapy. Yet their descriptions are often insufficient for risk assessment, legal decision making, and treatment planning. In the present study, we test whether a new procedure—narrative elaboration—facilitates children's recall without jeopardizing accuracy. Thirty-three second graders participated in a classroom activity. Two weeks later, they were randomly assigned to participate in one of two preparation sessions before being interviewed about the classroom activity: (a) narrative elaboration intervention or (b) control session. The interviewer was an unfamiliar authority figure. The interview entailed free recall (e.g., "What happened?"), cued recall (i.e., an opportunity to elaborate on free recall with visual cues), and follow-up questions. On the cued recall task, children prepared with the narrative elaboration procedure reported significantly more correct information than children in the control group. Performance was improved without increasing error or reducing correct responses to follow-up questions. The implications of these results for questioning suspected child abuse victims are discussed.

Child Maltreatment, Vol. 1, No. 3, 200-212 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/1077559596001003003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. N. Carnes, D. Nelson-Gardell, C. Wilson, and U. C. Orgassa Extended Forensic Evaluation When Sexual Abuse is Suspected: A Multisite Field Study Child Maltreat, August 1, 2001; 6(3): 230 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. N. Carnes, C. Wilson, and D. Nelson-Gardell Extended Forensic Evaluation When Sexual Abuse is Suspected: A Model and Preliminary Data Child Maltreat, August 1, 1999; 4(3): 242 - 254. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Sarno and S. K. Wurtele Effects of a Personal Safety Program on Preschoolers' Knowledge, Skills, and Perceptions of Child Sexual Abuse Child Maltreat, February 1, 1997; 2(1): 35 - 45. [Abstract]