Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Child Maltreatment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warren, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Perry, N. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Warren, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Perry, N. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

"It Sounds Good in Theory, But...": Do Investigative Interviewers Follow Guidelines Based on Memory Research?

Amye R. Warren

University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

Cara E. Woodall

University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

Jennifer S. Hunt

University of Minnesota

Nancy W. Perry

Creighton University

We compared 42 transcripts of sexual abuse interviews conducted by child protective services personnel in one state to practices currently recommended by researchers on children's testimony. Although the majority of the interviewers attempted to establish rapport, they rarely conducted practice interviews regarding past, neutral events, and rarely informed children that "I don't know,""I don't understand," and "I don't remember" are acceptable answers to questions. Further, the majority of the interviewers failed to begin their abuse-related questioning with general, open-ended questions, instead relying primarily on specific, yes/no questions throughout the interview. Finally, interviewers frequently introduced new material not previously disclosed by the children and failed to clarify the sources of new information.

Child Maltreatment, Vol. 1, No. 3, 231-245 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/1077559596001003006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Child MaltreatHome page
I. Hershkowitz
Socioemotional Factors in Child Sexual Abuse Investigations
Child Maltreat, May 1, 2009; 14(2): 172 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Child Psychol PsychiatryHome page
J. B. Mordock
Interviewing Abused and Traumatized Children
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, April 1, 2001; 6(2): 271 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Police QuarterlyHome page
K. London
Investigative Interviews of Children: A Review of Psychological Research and Implications for Police Practices
Police Quarterly, March 1, 2001; 4(1): 123 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child MaltreatHome page
J. M. Wood and S. Garven
How Sexual Abuse Interviews Go Astray: Implications for Prosecutors, Police, and Child Protection Services
Child Maltreat, May 1, 2000; 5(2): 109 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]