|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Treatment Outcome Research with Abused Children: Methodological Considerations in Three Studies
John Briere
University of Southern California School of Medicine
This article reviews three new studies of treatment outcome for abused children and discusses their methodological implications. Among those issues considered are measurement quality, level of experimental design, potential sources of bias, clinical significance, real-world generalizability, and prediction of treatment outcome.
Child Maltreatment, Vol. 1, No. 4,
348-352 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/1077559596001004006

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. K. Sawyer, E. H. Tsao, D. J. Hansen, and M. F. Flood
Weekly Problems Scales: Instruments for Sexually Abused Youth and Their Nonoffending Parents in Treatment
Child Maltreat,
February 1, 2006;
11(1):
34 - 48.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. Taylor and C. M. Chemtob
Efficacy of Treatment for Child and Adolescent Traumatic Stress
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med,
August 1, 2004;
158(8):
786 - 791.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Moore, G. Armsden, and P. L. Gogerty
A Twelve-Year Follow-Up Study of Maltreated and At-Risk Children who Received early Therapeutic Child Care
Child Maltreat,
February 1, 1998;
3(1):
3 - 16.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|