This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mathews, B. Articles by Kenny, M. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mathews, B. Articles by Kenny, M. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Mandatory Reporting Legislation in the United States, Canada, and Australia: A Cross-Jurisdictional Review of Key Features, Differences, and Issues

Queensland University of Technology

Maureen C. Kenny

Florida International University, kennym{at}fiu.edu

Mandatory child abuse reporting laws have developed in particular detail in the United States, Canada, and Australia as a central part of the governments' strategy to detect cases of abuse and neglect at an early stage, protect children, and facilitate the provision of services to children and families. However, the terms of these laws differ in significant ways, both within and between these nations, with the differences tending to broaden or narrow the scope of cases required to be reported and by whom. The purpose of this article is to provide a current and systematic review of mandatory reporting legislation in the 3 countries that have invested most heavily in them to date. A comparison of key elements of these laws is conducted, disclosing significant differences and illuminating the issues facing legislatures and policymaking bodies in countries already having the laws. These findings will also be instructive to those jurisdictions still developing their laws and to those that may, in the future, choose to design a system of mandatory reporting.

Key Words: mandatory reporting legislation • child abuse and neglect • child protection agencies • cross-jurisdictional review

Child Maltreatment, Vol. 13, No. 1, 50-63 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1077559507310613


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Mathews, H. Payne, C. Bonnet, and D. Chadwick A way to restore British paediatricians' engagement with child protection Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2009; 94(5): 329 - 332. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Rankin and A. E. Ornstein A Commentary on Mandatory Reporting Legislation in the United States, Canada, and Australia: A Cross-Jurisdictional Review of Key Features, Differences, and Issues Child Maltreat, February 1, 2009; 14(1): 121 - 123. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Jenny Medicine Discovers Child Abuse JAMA, December 17, 2008; 300(23): 2796 - 2797. [Full Text] [PDF]