Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Child Maltreatment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaffin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chaffin, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Our Minds Are Made Up—Don't Confuse Us With the Facts: Commentary on Policies Concerning Children With Sexual Behavior Problems and Juvenile Sex Offenders

Mark Chaffin

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Mark-chaffin{at}ouhsc.edu

This commentary examines four common policy-relevant perceptions of teen and preteen sex offenders—high risk, "specialness," homogeneity, and intransigence. Each perception is contrasted with long-standing as well as more current scientific facts. It is argued that public policies for these youth have been fundamentally driven by misperceptions, resulting in a set of well-intentioned but ultimately flawed policies and practices that are unlikely to deliver either child protection or juvenile justice benefits. These include federal and state policies pertaining to public registration and notification, community management, institutional placement, treatment approaches, and treatment standards. The research evidence about these juveniles is considerably more positive than current policies or clinical practices might suggest, and reflects a sharp disconnect between popular policy-relevant perceptions and the facts as we know them about these diverse cases.

Key Words: juvenile sex offenders • policy

Child Maltreatment, Vol. 13, No. 2, 110-121 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1077559508314510


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
E. J. Letourneau, D. Bandyopadhyay, D. Sinha, and K. S. Armstrong
The Influence of Sex Offender Registration on Juvenile Sexual Recidivism
Criminal Justice Policy Review, June 1, 2009; 20(2): 136 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
E. J. Letourneau and K. S. Armstrong
Recidivism Rates for Registered and Nonregistered Juvenile Sexual Offenders
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, December 1, 2008; 20(4): 393 - 408.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child MaltreatHome page
J. F. Silovsky and E. J. Letourneau
Introduction to Special Issue on Children With Sexual Behavior Problems: Dedicated to William F. Friedrich, PhD
Child Maltreat, May 1, 2008; 13(2): 107 - 109.
[PDF]