Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Child Maltreatment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1077559509332263v1
14/4/356    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaffin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kees, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chaffin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kees, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Motivational Intervention Can Improve Retention in PCIT for Low-Motivation Child Welfare Clients

Mark Chaffin

University of Oklahoma, mark-chaffin{at}ouhsc.edu

Linda Anne Valle

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Beverly Funderburk

University of Oklahoma

Robin Gurwitch

University of Oklahoma

Jane Silovsky

University of Oklahoma

David Bard

University of Oklahoma

Carol McCoy

University of Oklahoma

Michelle Kees

University of Michigan

A motivational orientation intervention designed to improve parenting program retention was field tested versus standard orientation across two parenting programs, Parent—Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) and a standard didactic parent training group. Both interventions were implemented within a frontline child welfare parenting center by center staff. Participants had an average of six prior child welfare referrals, primarily for neglect. A double-randomized design was used to test main and interaction effects. The motivational intervention improved retention only when combined with PCIT (cumulative survival = 85% vs. around 61% for the three other design cells). Benefits were robust across demographic characteristics and participation barriers but were concentrated among participants whose initial level of motivation was low to moderate. There were negative effects for participants with relatively high initial motivation. The findings suggest that using a motivational intervention combined with PCIT can improve retention when used selectively with relatively low to moderately motivated child welfare clients.

Key Words: dropout • retention • parenting • PCIT • child abuse • child neglect

This version was published on November 1, 2009

Child Maltreatment, Vol. 14, No. 4, 356-368 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1077559509332263


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?