| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Does Bruising Help Determine Which Fractures Are Caused by Abuse?Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Medical College of Wisconsin, tvalvano{at}chw.org
Children's Memorial Hospital Northwestern University Children's Memorial Research Center, Chicago
Children's Memorial Hospital Northwestern University
CARES Northwest Emanuel Children's Hospital To determine whether the presence or absence of bruising can be used to differentiate between abusive and nonabusive fractures, a retrospective study was conducted of patients with acute fractures referred to a child abuse team. A bruise and fracture were considered associated if both occurred on the same body site. Chart summaries, excluding information on bruising, were reviewed by 2 abuse experts to assign cause of injury. Of the 150 participants, fractures of 93 (62%) were categorized as abusive and 57 (38%) as nonabusive. Bruising associated with a fracture was found for 26% of abused and 25% of nonabused children. Most children (61%) had no bruises anywhere on the body, and this did not differ significantly by cause of injury. The sensitivity of a bruise associated with a fracture to predict abuse was only 26%. The presence or absence of bruising was not useful to differentiate between abusive and nonabusive fractures.
Key Words: bruise fracture abuse
This version was published on November
1, 2009 Child Maltreatment, Vol. 14, No. 4,
376-381 (2009) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||