This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fargason, C. A. Articles by Fountain, K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Fargason, C. A., Jr. Articles by Fountain, K. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Limitations of the Current Child Sexual Abuse Medical Literature from a Bayesian Perspective

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Kristin Zorn

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Carolyn Ashworth

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Kathy Fountain

University of Alabama at Birmingham

This article explores whether the current child sexual abuse literature supports the use of Bayes's Theorem as a means of incorporating medical examination findings into child protection decisions. The purpose of the article is to determine whether likelihood ratios for specific physical findings are available from the current medical literature and to describe deficiencies in the quality of the quantitative medical information available to child abuse decision makers. The article reviews the structure of the current literature from a medical decision-making framework. Of the articles providing quantitative estimates of the value of different physical findings for decision making, only one article allows for the calculation of likelihood ratios for physical examination findings in prepubertal females in a form that facilitates decision making. This article fails to address the interaction between different medical findings. In addition, the examiners in this study were not blinded to whether patients examined had been sexually abused. Although the current child abuse literature can provide estimates of the strength of different physical examination findings, decision makers should be aware of the limitations of these estimates.

Child Maltreatment, Vol. 2, No. 1, 73-77 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1077559597002001008


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Proeve Issues in the Application of Bayes' Theorem to Child Abuse Decision Making Child Maltreat, February 1, 2009; 14(1): 114 - 120. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Atabaki and J. E. Paradise The Medical Evaluation of the Sexually Abused Child: Lessons From a Decade of Research Pediatrics, July 1, 1999; 104(1): 178 - 178. [Full Text]

				V. J. Palusci, E. O. Cox, T. A. Cyrus, S. W. Heartwell, F. E. Vandervort, and E. S. Pott Medical Assessment and Legal Outcome in Child Sexual Abuse Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, April 1, 1999; 153(4): 388 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]