Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Child Maltreatment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedrich, W. N.
Right arrow Articles by Zinsmeister, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Friedrich, W. N.
Right arrow Articles by Zinsmeister, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Concordance of Reports of Childhood Abuse by Adults

William N. Friedrich

Mayo Foundation, Rochester

N. J. Talley

University of Sidney and The Nepean Hospital, Penrith

Laurel Panser

Mayo Foundation, Rochester

Sara Fett

Mayo Foundation, Rochester

A. R. Zinsmeister

Mayo Foundation, Rochester

A random sample of 610 adults, enrolled in a population-based, prospective cohort study, were examined by questionnaire on two occasions (separated by an average of 20 months) about unwanted sexual experiences, physical abuse, and psychological abuse that might have occurred when they were younger. Although the screening questions for these types of maltreatment were not identical at the initial and followup surveys, relatively high levels of concordance were identified. Agreement on sexual abuse between both questionnaires was 85.6% (kappa =.64), 91.8% for physical abuse (kappa =.59), and 65.4% for psychological abuse (kappa =.25). Reports of noncontact sexual abuse accounted for approximately one fourth of the nonconcordant reports on sexual abuse. Logistic regression examining demographic variables (e.g., age, gender, marital status, education level) was used to identify predictors of concordance in subjects who indicated a specific abuse type on either questionnaire. Females had significantly greater concordance on sexual abuse, whereas marital status predicted concordance for psychological abuse. No variables were identified that predicted concordance on physical abuse.

Child Maltreatment, Vol. 2, No. 2, 164-171 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1077559597002002009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AssessmentHome page
D. DiLillo, M. A. Fortier, S. A. Hayes, E. Trask, A. R. Perry, T. Messman-Moore, A. Fauchier, and C. Nash
Retrospective Assessment of Childhood Sexual and Physical Abuse: A Comparison of Scaled and Behaviorally Specific Approaches
Assessment, September 1, 2006; 13(3): 297 - 312.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child MaltreatHome page
W. N. Friedrich, M. Lysne, L. Sim, and S. Shamos
Assessing Sexual Behavior in High-Risk Adolescents with the Adolescent Clinical Sexual Behavior Inventory (ACSBI)
Child Maltreat, August 1, 2004; 9(3): 239 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]