Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Child Maltreatment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelley, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Yorker, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kelley, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Yorker, B. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Role of Nonphysician Health Care Providers in the Physical Assessment and Diagnosis of Suspected Child Maltreatment: Results of a National Survey

Susan J. Kelley

Georgia State University

Beatrice Crofts Yorker

Georgia State University

The physical diagnosis and treatment of child abuse and neglect have traditionally fallen in the domain of physicians; however, nurse practitioners (NPs), registered nurses (RNs), and physician assistants (PAs) are assuming increasing roles in the evaluation and treatment of maltreated children. The role of nonphysician health care providers in evaluating cases of suspected child maltreatment (CM) is not without controversy and deserves close attention for several reasons. First and foremost, a diagnosis of suspected CM has serious civil and criminal legal ramifications. A "false positive" evaluation—concluding that abuse occurred when it has not occurred—could result in the wrongful removal of a child from his or her family, or criminal prosecution and conviction of an innocent individual, or both. On the other hand, a "false negative" finding—failing to diagnose suspected abuse when in fact it has occurred—could result in subjecting a child to subsequent abuse, resulting in increased physical and psychological harm. Because cases of CM often rely heavily on physical findings and laboratory evidence, examiners must be adequately prepared to perform such examinations. Expert testimony also plays a critical role in child abuse litigation. According to federal law, before a professional may testify as an expert witness, the judge must be convinced that the professional possesses sufficient "knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education" to qualify as an expert. Do RNs, NPs, and PAs possess the credentials necessary to qualify as expert witnesses in cases of CM? The purpose of this article is to describe the roles, responsibilities, and qualifications of NPs, RNs, and PAs working in the field of CM. More specifically, the results of a national survey of NPs, RNs, and PAs who perform physical assessments in cases of suspected child physical abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse will be presented.

Child Maltreatment, Vol. 2, No. 4, 331-340 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1077559597002004006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?