Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Child Maltreatment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Adams, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Role of Photo Documentation of Genital Findings in Medical Evaluations of Suspected Child Sexual Abuse

Joyce A. Adams, M.D.

University of California, San Diego Medical Center

Results of a national survey of 104 nurse practitioners (NPs), registered nurses (RNs), and Physician Assistants (PAs) who conducted physical assessments in cases of suspected child physical abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse revealed that evaluation for suspected CSA was the type of evaluation conducted most often (92.5%), followed by physical abuse (70%), and neglect (54%). Most participants (76.9%) conducting CSA evaluations used a colposcope and interpreted colposcopic findings (70.2%). The mean number of years of speciality practice in CM reported by participants was 6, with a range of one to 20 years. While the majority (68%) of respondents were members of interdisciplinary child protection teams, only 10.7% were members of child fatality review teams.

Although the vast majority (78.4%) of participants had testified in court on CM cases, most reported experiencing barriers to testifying in cases of CM. The barrier to testifying cited most often was a lack of credibility with the judicial system (60%), with 32% of respondents citing not being a physician (31%) as a major barrier in being accepted as an expert in CM.

Implications for practice, policy, and future research are discussed.

Child Maltreatment, Vol. 2, No. 4, 341-347 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1077559597002004007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
L. M. Jones, T. P. Cross, W. A. Walsh, and M. Simone
Criminal Investigations of Child Abuse: The Research Behind "Best Practices"
Trauma Violence Abuse, July 1, 2005; 6(3): 254 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]