This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by King, G. Articles by Thatte, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by King, G. Articles by Thatte, N. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Child Abuse Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Substantiation as a Multitier Process: The Results of a NIS-3 Analysis

Penn State University

Nico Trocmé

University of Toronto

Nandita Thatte

Penn State University

Background: Previous studies on child maltreatment reporting have focused mainly on one level of substantiation. This article analyzes factors influencing the multitiered substantiation process. Method: The 1993 Third National Incidence Study (NIS-3) data of substantiated and non-substantiated reported incidents (N=7,263) of maltreatment were analyzed. Substantiation was classified into three categories: unfounded, indicated, and founded. Independent variables included demographic characteristics, case-processing variables, and maltreatment characteristics. Data analysis: Bivariate and multiple logistic regression (MLR) analyses were calculated to determine whether demographic and case processing variables predicted unfounded or founded/indicated dispositions. Second-level analysis examined demographic, case processing, and maltreatment characteristics as predictors of founded or indicated status. Results: These results showed that 60.2% of CPS investigations conducted were evaluated as unfounded, about 22% were categorized as founded, and 17% were classified as indicated. In the MLR analysis for the first level of substantiation, case processing variables were highly significant predictors of founded/indicated status. In the second-level substantiation MLR model, cases in the mid-range income level ($15,000-29,999) had a lower probability (adjusted OR = .58, p = .02) of being founded than those of less than $15,000, and reports involving Hispanic children (OR = 3.04, p = .05) were more likely than the "all other" race-ethnic social classification to have been substantiated as founded. Conclusions: This analysis of NIS-3 data suggests that a three-tiered rather than a two-tiered system is a more accurate representation of the CPS substantiation process. Further analysis of substantiation patterns is required to provide a basis for developing more effective investigation systems.

Key Words: substantiation • child protection services • national incidence surveys • child abuse

Child Maltreatment, Vol. 8, No. 3, 173-182 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1077559503254143


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Trocme, D. Knoke, B. Fallon, and B. MacLaurin Differentiating Between Substantiated, Suspected, and Unsubstantiated Maltreatment in Canada Child Maltreat, February 1, 2009; 14(1): 4 - 16. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. P. Cross and C. Casanueva Caseworker Judgments and Substantiation Child Maltreat, February 1, 2009; 14(1): 38 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. S. Slep and R. E. Heyman Creating and Field-Testing Child Maltreatment Definitions: Improving the Reliability of Substantiation Determinations Child Maltreat, August 1, 2006; 11(3): 217 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF]