This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1077559508318400v1 14/1/38    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cross, T. P. Articles by Casanueva, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cross, T. P. Articles by Casanueva, C. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Child Abuse Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Caseworker Judgments and Substantiation

RTI International

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tpcross{at}uiuc.edu.

	Abstract

Substantiation can have an important effect on what interventions are pursued for children investigated for maltreatment, but researchers lack knowledge about how the decision to substantiate is made. Using information from 4,515 children from a national probability study of children investigated for maltreatment, this study examined how caseworker judgments of harm, risk, and evidence predicted substantiation. The substantiation rate was 29.9%, but the majority of cases were substantiated when caseworkers reported at least moderate harm, at least moderate risk, and/or probably to clearly sufficient evidence. Each judgment variable significantly predicted substantiation in a multivariable model, with evidence the strongest predictor. Child gender and age were significant predictors beyond harm, risk, and evidence, suggesting that other judgments also influence substantiation. In 9 of 100 cases, reports were not substantiated despite moderate to severe harm. Thus, substantiation is generally based on judgments of harm, risk, and evidence but not exclusively. The findings underline previous researchers’ conclusions that substantiation is a flawed measure of child maltreatment and suggest that policy and practice related to substantiation are due for a fresh appraisal by state child welfare service agencies.

First published on September 15, 2008, doi:10.1177/1077559508318400

Child Maltreatment 2009;14:38.

A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Fluke Allegory of the Cave: On the Theme of Substantiation Child Maltreat, February 1, 2009; 14(1): 69 - 72. [PDF]